~~~
Christopher Clarey is one of my favorite tennis journalists and in this recent story, he seems to despair of the sport ever finding the commissioner that could fix the wacky schedule and the injuries it seems to produce.
This week and next are the "off-season" for junior tennis, as the ITF tournaments are Grade 4s & 5s in places like Bolivia, Indonesia, Peru and Rwanda. With the clamor to shorten the professional season becoming deafening, it's interesting that the junior tennis calendar hasn't produced a similar outcry. It has the same grand slams, five other Grade A events and team events like Junior Davis Cup--and that's just the ITF portion. If a player from the United States plays the USTA nationals, add four more "majors," leaving the schedule very similar to that of a professional. And junior players of course, are still expected, at least in this country, to be going to school too.
So if the tennis demands (or opportunities) are the same as those in the professional ranks, what keeps junior tennis from the current rash of withdrawals and injuries that are plaguing the year-ending competitions on the ATP and WTA tours?
This is not to imply that junior tennis is intrinsically better because it lacks these things. It's just that sponsors and fans and money and television and player organizations come with problems -- just as the lack of all these things does. It was singer Sophie Tucker who said, "I've been rich and I've been poor. Believe me, honey, rich is better." But maybe not for the tennis fan.